Chittum v. Dixon et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/6/14. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
MARK CHITTUM,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:14CV272-HEH
DR. DIXON, etal
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)
By Memorandum Order entered October 16, 2014, the Court denied Plaintiffs
motion to postpone the action, and directed Plaintiff, within fourteen (14) days ofthe date
ofentry thereof, to file aresponse to the Memorandum Order indicating his clear intent to
proceed with this action. The Court warned that failure to comply with this directive
would result in dismissal ofthe action. More than fourteen (14) days have passed and
Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's directive. Accordingly, the action will be
dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy ofthe Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff.
It is so ORDERED.
/§/
Date: flgu.fc 2»/<y
Richmond, Virginia
HENRY E. HUDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
