Walker v. Clarke

Filing 23

FINAL ORDER that: 1) Walker's Objections are OVERRULED. 2) Walker's Motions for the Appointment of Counsel 16 , and 17 are DENIED. 3) The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. 4) The Motion to Dismiss 12 is GRANTED. 5) Walker's claims and the action are DISMISSED. 6) The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Should Walker desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 7/14/2015. The Memorandum Opinion and Final Order were mailed to the Petitioner. (sbea, )

Download PDF
II L If, 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Jll 1 4 2015 Richmond Division CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICKr/iOND. VA DARNELL L. WALKER, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:14CV291 V. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. FINAL ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. Walker's Objections are OVERRULED. Walker's Motions for the Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. 16, 17) are 3. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. 4. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. DENIED. 5. Walker's claims and the action are DISMISSED. 6. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Should Walker desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Final Order to Walker. It is so ORDERED. Da.e:V'/^-/; Richmond, Virginia Senic; J. ' i." uict Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?