Smith v. Pearson
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 08/22/2014. Copy mailed to Petitioner on 8/22/14.(tjoh, )
I
P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
.22 2014
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
[^
L,
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND. VA
RALPH M. SMITH,
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 3:14CV347
v.
EDDIE PEARSON,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Memorandum Order entered on June 30, 2014, the Court directed
Petitioner to complete and return, within fifteen days of the date of entry thereof, an affidavit in
support of his request to proceed informapauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee. The Court
warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the above requirement would result in the
dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More than fifteen (15) days have passed since
the entry of the June 30, 2014 Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not returned the required
informa pauperis affidavit or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Order shall issue.
/s/
James R. Spencer
Date: *'**•<¥
Richmond, Virginia
li
SeniorU. S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?