Smith v. Lane et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/12/2015. (tjoh, )

Download PDF
IP IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA i u fcB 12 2015 CL I KYLE D. SMITH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14CV613-HEH LT. LANE, etal, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) On October 10,2014, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed informapauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on January 9, 2015, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $.72 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. WDate:^L1-2-70/1 Richmond, Virginia Is/ Henry E. Hudson United States District Judge i rUK^CSHMDSgICvIC0URT Richmond Division dismissed without prejudice. E

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?