Smith v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER that the 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is further ORDERED that: 1) PLAINTIFF'S 13 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is denied; 2) DEFENDANT 'S 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is granted; 3) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and 4) The Clerk shall close this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/15/2015. Order was distributed as directed. (sbea, )
B
IN THE UNITED
L
OCT I 6 2015
STATES DISTRICT COURT
•-^1
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
DESIREE S.
CLERK. U.S. DISTRICTCOURT
RIChlviOND. VA
SMITH,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
V .
CAROLYN W.
3:14cv699
COLVIN,
Commissioner of
Social
Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter i s before the Court on the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
of the Magistrate Judge entered on September 28,
17) .
no
2015
(Docket No.
Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, and there being
timely
filed
objections
thereto,
and
the
time
for
filing
objections having expired, and having considered the record and the
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, i t is hereby
ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge
(Docket No. 17) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT
AND
RECOMMENDATION.
It
is
(1)
further ORDERED that:
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No.
13)
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No.
14)
is denied;
(2)
is granted;
(3)
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and
(4)
The Clerk shall close this action.
The Clerk is directed to send a
Plaintiff and to counsel
It
is
for
copy of this Order to the
the defendant.
so ORDERED.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia^
Date:
October
2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?