Smith v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER that the 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is further ORDERED that: 1) PLAINTIFF'S 13 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is denied; 2) DEFENDANT 'S 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is granted; 3) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and 4) The Clerk shall close this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/15/2015. Order was distributed as directed. (sbea, )

Download PDF
B IN THE UNITED L OCT I 6 2015 STATES DISTRICT COURT •-^1 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DESIREE S. CLERK. U.S. DISTRICTCOURT RIChlviOND. VA SMITH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. V . CAROLYN W. 3:14cv699 COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER This matter i s before the Court on the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge entered on September 28, 17) . no 2015 (Docket No. Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, and there being timely filed objections thereto, and the time for filing objections having expired, and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, i t is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 17) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is (1) further ORDERED that: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 13) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 14) is denied; (2) is granted; (3) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and (4) The Clerk shall close this action. The Clerk is directed to send a Plaintiff and to counsel It is for copy of this Order to the the defendant. so ORDERED. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia^ Date: October 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?