UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/9/2018. Copy to Pro Se defendant. (jsmi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Civil Action No. 3:15cvl61
LEWIS F. CARTER,
This matter comes before the Court on three motions filed by Defendant Lewis F. Carter:
(1) Carter's "Motion to Alter or Amend the Order of the Court" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 59(e)' (the "Motion to Alter orAmend"), (ECF No. 99); (2) Carter's "Motion by New
Evidence to Void Judgment for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of the District Court to
Enforce Plaintiffs Assessments of a Direct and Unapportioned Tax on Income under Article I,
Section 8 Authorities as Erroneously Done by the Court; and for Fraud Upon the Court" pursuant
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3),(4), and (6)^ and 60(d)(3)^ (the "First Motion to
' Rule 59(e) states: "(e) Motion to Alter orAmend a Judgment. Amotion to alter or
amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment." Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e).
Rule 60(b) states, in relevant part:
(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion
and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or
misconduct by an opposing party;
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?