Filing 108

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/9/2018. Copy to Pro Se defendant. (jsmi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:15cvl61 LEWIS F. CARTER, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on three motions filed by Defendant Lewis F. Carter: (1) Carter's "Motion to Alter or Amend the Order of the Court" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)' (the "Motion to Alter orAmend"), (ECF No. 99); (2) Carter's "Motion by New Evidence to Void Judgment for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of the District Court to Enforce Plaintiffs Assessments of a Direct and Unapportioned Tax on Income under Article I, Section 8 Authorities as Erroneously Done by the Court; and for Fraud Upon the Court" pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3),(4), and (6)^ and 60(d)(3)^ (the "First Motion to ' Rule 59(e) states: "(e) Motion to Alter orAmend a Judgment. Amotion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment." Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Rule 60(b) states, in relevant part: (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?