Cardenas v. U.S. Marshal Service
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/8/15. Copy sent: Yes (tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
lL
Richmond Division
JUN- 9 2015
JULIO C. CARDENAS,
ClERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:15CV192
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum
Order
conditionally docketed
directed Julio C.
entered
this
on April
action.
At
8,
2015,
the
Court
that
time,
the
Court
Cardenas to submit a statement under oath or
penalty of perjury that:
(A}
(B)
(C)
(D)
Identifies the nature of the action;
States his belief that he is entitled to relief;
Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give
security therefor; and,
Includes a statement of the assets he possesses.
See 28 U.S.C.
1915(a} (1}.
§
The Court provided Cardenas with an
in forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose.
Additionally,
the
Court
directed
Cardenas
to
affirm
his
intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a
consent
Cardenas
to
the
that
a
collection
failure
directives within thirty
to
(30)
of
fees
comply
form.
with
The
either
Court
of
the
warned
above
days of the date of entry thereof
would result in summary dismissal of the action.
Cardenas has
not
complied with
the
order of
this
Court.
Cardenas failed to return the in forma pauperis affidavit and
the consent to collection of fees form.
As a result,
not qualify for in forma pauperis status.
Furthermore,
he does
he has
not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action.
28
u.s.c.
1914(a).
§
failure to prosecute.
Such
conduct
demonstrates
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
a
See
willful
Accordingly,
this action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send a
copy of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Cardenas.
/s/
flL/l
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date:
~
Richmo~,-
1, Z6J>
Virginia
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?