Cardenas v. U.S. Marshal Service

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/8/15. Copy sent: Yes (tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA lL Richmond Division JUN- 9 2015 JULIO C. CARDENAS, ClERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:15CV192 U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order conditionally docketed directed Julio C. entered this on April action. At 8, 2015, the Court that time, the Court Cardenas to submit a statement under oath or penalty of perjury that: (A} (B) (C) (D) Identifies the nature of the action; States his belief that he is entitled to relief; Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give security therefor; and, Includes a statement of the assets he possesses. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a} (1}. § The Court provided Cardenas with an in forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose. Additionally, the Court directed Cardenas to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent Cardenas to the that a collection failure directives within thirty to (30) of fees comply form. with The either Court of the warned above days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Cardenas has not complied with the order of this Court. Cardenas failed to return the in forma pauperis affidavit and the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he does he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. 28 u.s.c. 1914(a). § failure to prosecute. Such conduct demonstrates See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). a See willful Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Cardenas. /s/ flL/l Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date: ~ Richmo~,- 1, Z6J> Virginia 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?