Singleton v. Emran, et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/27/2017 (mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff). (nbrow)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division THOMAS GARCIA SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. Dr. EMRAN, et. al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ~ ...__,_J ~ :EB 2l8 20!~ CLERK, U.S. DISTRtCT COIJ8T RICHMOND, VA Civil Action No. 3:15CV200-HEH MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on April 8, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must keep the Court informed as to his current address or if he was released. By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January 27, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. On February 10, 2017, the United States Postal Service returned a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order sent to Plaintiff marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," "VACANT," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the remaining action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. ~ Date: r:;( z.-i 2017 Richmond, vfrginia Isl HENRY E. HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?