Singleton v. Emran, et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/27/2017 (mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff). (nbrow)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

THOMAS GARCIA SINGLETON,
Plaintiff,

v.
Dr. EMRAN, et. al,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

~ ...__,_J ~
:EB 2l8 20!~
CLERK, U.S. DISTRtCT COIJ8T
RICHMOND, VA

Civil Action No. 3:15CV200-HEH

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on April 8, 2015, the Court conditionally
docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must keep the
Court informed as to his current address or if he was released. By Memorandum Opinion
and Order entered on January 27, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part
Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. On February 10, 2017, the United States Postal Service
returned a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order sent to Plaintiff marked,
"RETURN TO SENDER," "VACANT," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that
date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure
to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in
prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the remaining action
will be dismissed without prejudice.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

~
Date: r:;( z.-i 2017
Richmond, vfrginia

Isl

HENRY E. HUDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE