Henderson v. Clarke

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/18/2015. Copy mailed to Pro Se Petitioner. (jsmi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division REGINALD THOMAS HENDERSON, Petitioner, V, Civil Action No. 3:15CV248 HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a Virginia prisoner proceedingpro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court reviewed Petitioner's § 2254 submission and noted that it is not clear from Petitioner's submission whether he wished to pursue a civil rights action challenging the conditions of his confinement under42 U.S.C. § 1983 or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. "[T]he settled rules [provide] that habeas corpus relief is appropriate only when a prisoner attacks the fact or duration of confinement, see Preiser V. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973); whereas, challenges to the conditions of confinement that would not result in a definite reduction in the length of confinement are properly brought" by some other procedural vehicle. Olajide v. B.LC.E., 402 F. Supp. 2d 688, 695 (E.D. Va. 2005) (emphasis omitted) (internal parallel citations omitted) (citingStrader v. Troy, 571 F.2d 1263, 1269 (4th Cir. 1978)). By Memorandum Order entered on August 3, 2015, the Court directed Petitioner, within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof, to inform the Court whether it had properly characterized his claims as claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court warned Petitioner that if he failed to respond in a timely manner, the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice. More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed and Petitioner has not responded to the Court's Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ Date: SEP 1 8 2015 Richmond, Virginia M. Hannah Lauck . ., United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?