Huff v. Pearson et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/17/2016. Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff. (jsmi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CARL LEE HUFF,
Civil Action No.
EDDIE PEARSON, ^
Carl Lee Huff, Jr., a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and
in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
to state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C.
a plaintiff must
allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived
him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by
the United States.
Total Action Against
Poverty in Roanoke Valley,
145 F.3d 653,
(citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983) .
In his current Complaint, Huff does
violated by the defendants' conduct.
Accordingly, by Memorandum
Order entered on September 16, 2016, the Court directed Huff to
submit a particularized complaint within fourteen
failure to submit the particularized complaint would result in
the dismissal of the action.
days have elapsed since
will be dismissed without prejudice.
Opinion to Huff.
Rob tE P ne'"'
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?