Spellman v. Fowler et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Read Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/25/2016. (ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
FFB 16 201$
ELLIJAH SPELLMAN,
r»T • 4- •
Plaintiff,
CLGRi^U S-^'STRiCT COURT
RICHMOND. VA
V.
Civil Action No.
SERGEANT FOWLER, ^
3:15CV675
al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Order entered on December 22,
conditionally docketed
this
action.
directed Ellijah Spellman to
At
submit a
that
2015,
time,
the Court
the
Court
statement under oath or
penalty of perjury that:
(A)
(B)
Identifies the nature of the action,States his belief that he is entitled to relief;
(C)
Avers
(D)
security therefor; and,
Includes a statement of the assets he possesses.
See 28 U.S.C.
that he
is unable
§ 1915(a)(1).
to prepay fees
or give
The Court provided Spellman with an
in forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose.
Additionally,
the
Court
directed
Spellman
to
affirm
his
intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a
consent
Spellman
to
the
that
a
collection
failure
directives within thirty
to
(3 0)
of
fees
comply
form.
with
The
either
Court
of
the
warned
above
days of the date of entry thereof
would result in summary dismissal of the action.
Spellman
has
Spellman failed
the
consent
to
not
to
complied
return
the
the
m
forma
fees
collection of
not qualify for
with
order
form.
of
pauperis
As
forma pauperis status.
a
this
Court.
affidavit
result,
he
Furthermore,
U.S.C.
§
1914(a).
failure to prosecute.
Such
conduct
See Fed. R. Civ.
demonstrates
P. 41(b).
a
does
he has
not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action.
28
and
See
willful
Accordingly,
this action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send
a
copy
of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Spellman.
/s/
Robert E.
flu
Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date:
Richmond, Vi^^inia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?