Gaither v. Zook

Filing 23

ORDER that in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Gaither's objection (ECF No. 19 ) is OVERRULED; 2. The Amended Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14 ) is GRANTED; 4. Gaither's claim and the action are DISMISSED; and, 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 02/10/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division FEB I 0 2ot7 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA TORIAN GAITHER, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:16CV64 DAVID ZOOK, Respondent. ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Gaither's objection (ECF No. 19) is OVERRULED; The Amended Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED; Gaither's claim and the action are DISMISSED; and, A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Gaither desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Gaither and counsel of record. And it is so ORDERED. Date: February Richmond, Virginia 10, 2017 M. Hannah La United States ist i

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?