Wyche v. Kuchinsky et al

Filing 44

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/19/2017. Copy mailed to Defendant Kuchinsky. (walk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

LAFAYTHIA WYCHE,
Plaintiff,
V.

Civil Action No. 3:16cvI14

NEIL KUCHINSKY, et aL,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on two motions: (1) the Motion to Dismiss filed by

Defendant Neil Kuchinsky (the "Kuchinsky Motion to Dismiss"), (ECF No. 22); and, (2) the
Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., and RELX ANV, Inc.
(collectively, the "Lexis Defendants") (the "Lexis Motion to Dismiss"), (ECF No. 24). Wyche

has responded to the Kuchinsky Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 35), and the Lexis Motion to
Dismiss, (ECF No. 34). Kuchinsky did not reply to Wyche's response. The Lexis Defendants

replied to Wyche's response. (ECF No. 38.) The Court dispenses with oral argument because
the materials before it adequately present the facts and legal contentions, and argimient would
not aid the decisional process. Accordingly, the matters are ripe for disposition. The Court

exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.' For the reasons that follow, the Court will
grant the Lexis Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 24), and grant the Kuchinsky Motion to Dismiss,
(ECF No. 22). The Court will dismiss Wyche's Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20.)

' "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction ofall civil actions arising under the
Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Amended Complaint
alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the "FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. §§1681 et seq.