Burrell v. Zook
Filing
25
FINAL ORDER. In accordance with the accompanying 24 Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Burrell's objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9 ) is GRANTED; 4. Burrell's claims and the action are DISMISSED; and, 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Burrell desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/30/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Petitioner. (nbrow)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
JAMES DANIEL BURRELL,
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID ZOOK,
Respondent.
·-------·-·J
L
CLERK, U.S. DISTi11GT COURT
RICHMOl\JJ, VA
)
)
)
)
~I :ov ~o ~ 1~1
Civil Action No. 3:16CV122-HEH
)
)
)
)
FINAL ORDER
(Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Action)
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Burrell's objections are OVERRULED;
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is ACCEPTED and
ADOPTED;
The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED;
Burrell's claims and the action are DISMISSED; and,
A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Should Burrell desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the
Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a
notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Burrell
and counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.
Date: Nov.3o1 eo11a
Richmond, Virginia
~Isl
HENRY E. HUDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?