Bates v. Lundy Motors, LLC et al

Filing 81

ORDER that this matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 80 ), entered on September 30,2016. The time to file objections has expired, and neither party has objected to the R&R. Upon due consideration, and it appearing appropriate to do so, the R&R is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. In accordance with the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, Defendants' Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration (ECF No. 6 ), as amended by Defendants' Stipulation (ECF No. 61 ), is GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending arbitration. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/17/2016. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROBERT A. BATES, Plaintiff, V. ) ) ) ) ) LUNDY MOTORS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:16cvl33-HEH ) ) ) ) ORDER (Adopting the Report & Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Granting Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 80), entered on September 30,2016. The time to file objections has expired, and neither party has objected to the R&R. Upon due consideration, and it appearing appropriate to do so, the R&R is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. In accordance with the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, Defendants' Motion to Compel Binding Arbitration (ECF No. 6), as amended by Defendants' Stipulation (ECF No. 61), is GRANTED. This case is STAYED pending arbitration. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. Al^ jt Date: Ue.-f. /7 Richmond, Virginia /s/ Henry E. Hudson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?