Prince v. Colvin

Filing 12

ORDER (Adopting the Report & Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge). THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 11), entered on June 19, 2017. The time to file o bjections has expired, and neither party has objected to the R&R. Upon due consideration, and it appearing appropriate to do so, the R&R is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. In accordance with the findings of the United States Magis trate Judge, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED (ECF No. 7), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED (ECF No. 10), and the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 7/05/2017. (tjoh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division JACK LAWRENCE PRINCE, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16cvl75-HEH V. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant. ORDER (Adopting the Report & Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 11), entered on June 19, 2017. The time to file objections has expired, and neither party has objected to the R&R. Upon due consideration, and it appearing appropriate to do so, the R&R is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. In accordance with the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED (ECF No. 7), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED (ECF No. 10), and the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. /s/ Date: Julu S^SOll Richmond, firgmia Henry E. Hudson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?