Jones v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on August 21, 2017. The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 18 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judg ment or in the Alternative, Motion for Remand (ECF Nos. 11 and 12 ) is DENIED. (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15 ) is GRANTED. (4) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. (5) This case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 09/11/2017. (nbrow)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division BOBBY JEAN JONES, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. CIVIL NO. 3:16cv210 (JAG) ) ) ) ) ~~~~~~~~~-) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on August 21, 2017 (ECF No. 18). The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 18) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court. (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Motion for Remand (ECF Nos. 11 and 12) is DENIED. (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. (4) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. (5) This case is CLOSED. Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. Isl John A. Gibney, Jr. United States Dis •

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?