Roberts v. Naph Care Medical Department et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 06/07/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff. (nbrow)

IL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

JUN - 8 20!6
i

JASON THOMAS ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
V.

NAPH CARE MEDICAL
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Cl.~:PI<

U.S ['!Sr;:·:cT C0li9T
--: ), ! ;-i
1//1,

r-:.· !f"'.1 1r

Civil Action No. 3:16CV213-HEH

MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)
By Memorandum Order entered on April 29, 2016, the Court conditionally
docketed Plaintiffs action. The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the
full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court
warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty
(30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.
Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return ae
consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis
status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28
U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

~
Date: 'J°a>aic- 7 20/C
Richmond, Virginia

Isl

HENRY E. HUDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE