Gilbertson v. Jones et al
Filing
38
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 36 Report and Recommendations.; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Quash. See Order for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/01/2016. (ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
NOV
SUZANNE GILBERTSON,
I 20l6
CLERK, U.S. D1STn1CT COURl
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16cv255
STANLEY B. JONES, Ed.D,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
By Order entered herein on September 13, 2016, the pending
MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM (ECF No. 24) was
referred
to
Magistrate
Judge
David
J.
Novak
for
report
and
recommendation.
Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 36)
entered herein on September 22, 2016, and there being no timely filed
objections thereto,
expired,
and the time for
filing objections having
and having considered the record and the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED
that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No.
36)
is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION.
It is further ORDERED that the MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM ( ECF No. 24) is granted in part and denied in part.
The
motion is denied with respect to the notes of Melissa Hipolit from
her interview with the defendant, Stanley B. Jones, and the motion
is granted with respect to the request for all other materials from
Ms. Hipolit.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date: November __L_, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?