Jack v. Chapman et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for further details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/08/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, ) Modified on 2/9/2017 (ccol, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
FEB - 9 2017
JAMES L. JACK,
CLERK, U.S. DiSTl11CT COURT
Civil Action No.
MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, et al.,
James L. Jack,
a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis, filed this 42
state a viable claim under 42 U. s. c.
In order to
1983, a plaintiff must
allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived
him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by
a law of the United States.
Poverty in Roanoke Valley,
See Dowe v. Total Action Against
145 F. 3d 653,
In his current Complaint, Jack does
violated by the defendants'
current rambling allegations fail to provide each defendant with
fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her
See Bell Atl. Corp, v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544,
Accordingly, by Memorandum Order
entered on January 11, 2017, the Court directed Jack to submit a
particularized complaint within fourteen
days of the date
of entry thereof.
The Court warned Jack that
dismissal of the action.
More than fourteen
days have elapsed since the entry
particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the
January ll, 2017 Memorandum Order.
be dismissed without prejudice.
Accordingly, the action will
Plaintiff is free to file a new
action that amplifies the factual and legal basis upon which his
The Clerk is directed to send a
Opinion to Jack.
~ ~JYW~ ~\ 1-011
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?