Harvey v. Hackett
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/09/2016. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tjoh, )
p
p
NOV -92016 \jj
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
CLERK, U.S. DiSTRlCT COURT
RICHMO.VD, VA
RODNEY CONNELL HARVEY,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
V.
3:16CV347
MAJOR HACKETT,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rodney Connell Harvey,
and
forma pauperis,
order
to
state
a
a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se
filed this 42 U.S.C.
viable
claim
under
§
42
1983 action.
U.S.C.
§
In
1983,
a
plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state
law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right
conferred by a
law
of
the
United States.
Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley,
Cir. 1998)
(citing 42 U.S.C.
Harvey fails
facts
and
Accordingly,
the
to provide
legal
§ 1983) .
Court
warned
(14)
basis
upon
days
Harvey
particularized complaint
action.
v.
145 F.3d 653,
Total
658
(4th
In his current Complaint,
which
of
his
entered
Court directed Harvey to submit a
fourteen
Dowe
the defendant with fair notice of
by Memorandum Order
within
See
the
date
that
the
would
result
liability
on October
the
rests.
11,
2016,
particularized complaint
of
entry
failure
in
the
to
thereof.
The
submit
the
dismissal
of
the
More than fourteen
of
the
October
submit a
11,
2016
(14)
days have elapsed since the entry
Memorandum Order.
Harvey
failed
to
particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the
October 11, 2016 Memorandum Order.
Accordingly,
the action will
be dismissed without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send a
copy
of
this
Memorandum
Opinion to Harvey.
/s/
^
Date:
Robert E. Payne
^ S e n i o r ISiited States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?