Nipper v. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 17 ) is adopted. It is further ORDERED that: (1) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 13 ) is denied; (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION T O REMAND (Docket No. 14 ) is denied; (3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16 ) is granted; (5) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and (6) The Clerk shall close this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/14/2017. (nbrow)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
ROY NIPPER,
r~ ~
rL
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16cv374
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
This
matter
RECOMMENDATION of
2017
(Docket
RECOMMENDATION,
is
before
the
Court
the Magistrate Judge
No.
and
17).
there
Having
being
on
REPORT
entered on August
reviewed
no
the
timely
the
filed
REPORT
AND
28,
AND
objections
thereto, and the time for filing objections having expired, and
having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
and finding
no error therein,
it
is
hereby ORDERED that
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge
17)
the
(Docket No.
is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION.
It is further ORDERED that:
(1)
PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket
13) is denied;
(2)
~~iĀ·~11
~ ~EP 152~u
r-'
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (Docket No. 14) is
No.
denied;
(3)
DEFENDANT'S
MOTION
FOR
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Docket
No.
16) is granted;
(5)
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and
(6)
The Clerk shall close this action.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send
a
copy of
this
Order
Plaintiff and all counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia.I.
Date: SeptemberĀµ, 2017
2
to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?