Nipper v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 17 ) is adopted. It is further ORDERED that: (1) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 13 ) is denied; (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION T O REMAND (Docket No. 14 ) is denied; (3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16 ) is granted; (5) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and (6) The Clerk shall close this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/14/2017. (nbrow)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROY NIPPER, r~ ~ rL CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:16cv374 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER This matter RECOMMENDATION of 2017 (Docket RECOMMENDATION, is before the Court the Magistrate Judge No. and 17). there Having being on REPORT entered on August reviewed no the timely the filed REPORT AND 28, AND objections thereto, and the time for filing objections having expired, and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge 17) the (Docket No. is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is further ORDERED that: (1) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket 13) is denied; (2) ~~iĀ·~11 ~ ~EP 152~u r-' PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (Docket No. 14) is No. denied; (3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16) is granted; (5) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and (6) The Clerk shall close this action. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order Plaintiff and all counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia.I. Date: SeptemberĀµ, 2017 2 to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?