Snyder v. Norfolk Commonwealth of Virginia et al

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

p

L

b

IN 222017
VIVIAN ANNE SNYDER,

r\>

L/

r.l.pt?K. 11 S t>5TfliCT COURT
R'THMOMD, VA

Petitioner,
V.

Civil Action No. 3;16CV567

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ByMemorandum Order entered on July 25,2016, the Court conditionally filed
Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that she must

keep the Court informed as to her current address. On May 30,2017, the United States Postal

Service returned the Memorandum Order and the Report and Recommendation entered on May
15,2017 to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," because Petitioner apparently
relocated. Since that date. Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address.
Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates her lack of

interest inprosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will DENY a certificate ofappealability.
An appropriate Ordershall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

M. Harmah

D

JUH 222017.

Richmond, Virginia

United Stat^loMrict Judge