Snyder v. Norfolk Commonwealth of Virginia et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
VIVIAN ANNE SNYDER,
r.l.pt?K. 11 S t>5TfliCT COURT
Civil Action No. 3;16CV567
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
ByMemorandum Order entered on July 25,2016, the Court conditionally filed
Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that she must
keep the Court informed as to her current address. On May 30,2017, the United States Postal
Service returned the Memorandum Order and the Report and Recommendation entered on May
15,2017 to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," because Petitioner apparently
relocated. Since that date. Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide a current address.
Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates her lack of
interest inprosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will DENY a certificate ofappealability.
An appropriate Ordershall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
United Stat^loMrict Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?