Morris v. Colvin
Filing
19
FINAL ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on August 30, 2017 (ECF No. 18). The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having consid ered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: record. (1) The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternati ve, Motion for Remand (ECF Nos. 12 and 13) are GRANTED. (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. ( 4) The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. (5) This case is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/15/2017. (tjoh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
KENDRA MORRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 3:16cv587 (MHL)
FINAL ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (R&R) entered on August 30, 2017 (ECF No. 18). The time to file objections has expired
and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it
otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED as the opinion of
this Court.
(2)
Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Motion for
Remand (ECF Nos. 12 and 13) are GRANTED.
(3)
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED.
(4)
The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
(5)
This case is CLOSED.
Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to Plaintiff and all counsel of
record.
It is so ORDERED.
Richmond, Virginia
Date: '1ยทยท t J" J 7
Is/
~Ftt
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?