Carmax, Inc. et al v. Sibley
Filing
38
ORDER that 37 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; and, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and Carmax, Inc.'s 32 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 5/12/2017. Copy to Pro Se Defendant as directed. (jsmi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.
and
CARMAX, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
V.
Civil Action No. 3:16cv611
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (R&R) entered on April 17,2017. (ECF No. 37.) The time to file objections has expired
and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it
otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) is ADOPTED as the opinion of
this Court; and,
(2)
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and Carmax, Inc.'s (collectively, "CarMax")
Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED, (ECF No. 32).
Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Order to Defendant Montgomery B. Sibley
at his address of record and to all counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.
ij/^
m.hM4
United States Dist icOudge
Richmond, Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?