Carmax, Inc. et al v. Sibley

Filing 38

ORDER that 37 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; and, CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and Carmax, Inc.'s 32 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 5/12/2017. Copy to Pro Se Defendant as directed. (jsmi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC. and CARMAX, INC., Plaintiffs, V. Civil Action No. 3:16cv611 MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on April 17,2017. (ECF No. 37.) The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; and, (2) CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. and Carmax, Inc.'s (collectively, "CarMax") Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs is GRANTED, (ECF No. 32). Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Order to Defendant Montgomery B. Sibley at his address of record and to all counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. ij/^ m.hM4 United States Dist icOudge Richmond, Virginia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?