Amazon Web Services, Inc. et al v. Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. LTD.
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/13/2017. (sbea, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.
Civil Action No. 3:16cv6I9
GLOBAL EQUITY MANAGEMENT, S.A.,
This matter comes before the Court on five motions: (1) Defendant Global Equity
Management, S.A.'s ("GEMSA") "Rule 12(b)(5)^^^ Motion to Quash Insufficient Service of
Process" (the "Motion to Quash"), (ECF No. 18); (2) GEMSA's "Rule 12(b)(2)P' Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction" (the "Motion to Dismiss"), (ECF No. 20); (3)
Plaintiffs Amazon Web Services, Inc. and VADATA, Inc.'s (collectively, the "Amazon
Plaintiffs") "Motion to Enjoin [GEMSA] From Litigating More Than 30 Collateral Identical
Customer Suits in the Eastern District of Texas" (the "Motion to Enjoin"), (ECF No. 25);
(4) GEMSA's "Motion to Strike or Stay [the Amazon Plaintiffs'] Motion to Enjoin" (the
"Motion to Strike"), (ECF No. 27); and, (5) GEMSA's "Opposed Motion to Withdraw as
Counsel" (the "Motion to Withdraw"), (ECF No. 35).
' Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) allows dismissal for "insufficient service of
process." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5).
^Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) allows dismissal for "lack of personal
jurisdiction." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?