Howe v. Manning et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/09/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff. (nbrow)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
FRANK EDWARD HOWE, III,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16CV660
OFFICER MANNING, et aL,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 26, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. Plaintiff
requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on September 15,
2016, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $.12 or state under penalty
of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the
date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(l). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial
filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed
informa pauperis. Plaintiffs disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action.
Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Order shall issue.
Date: NOV 0 9 2016
Richmond, Virginia
M.Hann
United Sta es District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?