Hall v. Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22 ) are overruled; (2) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 21 ) is adopted on the basis of t he reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) The PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SOCIAL SECURITY) (ECF No. 15 ) is denied; (4) The DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 17 ) is granted; and (5) The Commissioner& #039;s decision is affirmed. It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/12/2017. (nbrow)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

if~_t_ ~---~-i ff\l l
/;:Ji
1>1)11
~ ! SEP I 2 20l"r ~1lG

L
__________J

RICHARD ALAN HALL,

CLEnK, U.S. DIS11l!CT COURT
RICH!V10ND. VA

Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 3:16cv745

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate
Judge entered herein on August 2, 2017 (ECF No. 21) , the PLAINTIFF'S
OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRTE' S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22),
the DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (ECF

No. 23), and having considered the record and

the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 21) and finding no error
therein, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1)

The PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 22) are overruled;
(2)

The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (ECF

No. 21) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION;
(3)
SECURITY)

The

PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION

(ECF No. 15) is denied;

FOR

SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(SOCIAL

(4) The DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 16)
is granted; and
(5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed
by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the
decisional process.
It is so ORDERED.

/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge

Richmond, Virginia
Date: September~' 2017

2