Oakley v. Doss et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/20/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE ONITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VilRGINIA Richmond Division i r- CURTIS OAKLEY, ^ « „„,-t JAN 2 3 2017 " [ij/ rLERK U.S. DiSTfliCT COURT •bichmond.va Plaintiff, — V. Civil Action No. TIMOTHY DOSS, ^ 3:16CV762 al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Court Memorandum Order conditionally entered docketed on the September action. pay an initial partial 2016, filing 2016, Curtis requested leave to proceed ^ . forma pauperis. Order entered on October 13, 26, the Oakley By Memorandum the Court directed Oakley to fee of $22.13 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven {11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). On October 5, 2016, the Court received a letter from Oakley wherein he indicated that he would be released on October 25, 2016. (ECF No. 4-1, at 1.) provided a new address to reach him after that date. the Court has not heard 13, 2016 entered Memorandum on November from Oakley about Order. 30, Accordingly, 2016, the Court the by Oakley To date, Court's October Memorandum directed Order Oakley to complete and return the proper m forma pauperis affidavit for non-prisoners days within thirty (30) of the date of entry hereof. the See The Court warned Oakley that a Court's Fed. R. directives Civ. Pr. would result 41(b). in Oakley return the form or otherwise respond. Court's directives warrants failure to comply with dismissal failed of to the action. complete and Oakley's disregard of the dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Oakley. AH. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Date Richmon noncl, Vir^nia' ^

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?