Oakley v. Doss et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/20/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, )
IN THE ONITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
L
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VilRGINIA
Richmond Division
i r-
CURTIS OAKLEY,
^ « „„,-t
JAN 2 3 2017
"
[ij/
rLERK U.S. DiSTfliCT COURT
•bichmond.va
Plaintiff,
—
V.
Civil Action No.
TIMOTHY DOSS, ^
3:16CV762
al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By
Court
Memorandum
Order
conditionally
entered
docketed
on
the
September
action.
pay
an
initial
partial
2016,
filing
2016,
Curtis
requested leave to proceed ^ . forma pauperis.
Order entered on October 13,
26,
the
Oakley
By Memorandum
the Court directed Oakley to
fee
of
$22.13
or
state
under
penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay
such a fee within eleven {11) days of the date of entry thereof.
See
28
U.S.C.
§
1915(b)(1).
On
October
5,
2016,
the
Court
received a letter from Oakley wherein he indicated that he would
be released on October 25,
2016.
(ECF No.
4-1,
at 1.)
provided a new address to reach him after that date.
the
Court has not heard
13,
2016
entered
Memorandum
on
November
from Oakley about
Order.
30,
Accordingly,
2016,
the
Court
the
by
Oakley
To date,
Court's October
Memorandum
directed
Order
Oakley
to
complete and return the proper m
forma pauperis affidavit for
non-prisoners
days
within
thirty
(30)
of
the
date
of
entry
hereof.
the
See
The Court warned Oakley that a
Court's
Fed.
R.
directives
Civ.
Pr.
would
result
41(b).
in
Oakley
return the form or otherwise respond.
Court's
directives
warrants
failure to comply with
dismissal
failed
of
to
the
action.
complete
and
Oakley's disregard of the
dismissal
of
the
action.
Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send
a
copy
of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Oakley.
AH.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date
Richmon
noncl,
Vir^nia'
^
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?