Scott v. Wilson

Filing 28

FINAL ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ordered that: 1. Scott's Objections 26 are overruled; 2. The Report and Recommendation 24 is accepted and adopted; 3. The Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is granted; 4 . The § 2241 Petition 7 is denied; 5. Scott's claims and the action are dismissed; and, 6. The Court denies a certificate of appealability. Should Scott desire to appeal, a written notice of appealmust be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) daysof the date of entry hereof. See Final Order for details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 03/01/2018. Copy of Final Order and Memorandum Opinion mailed to Petitioner as directed. (ccol, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

ANDREW NEAL SCOTT,

1:-_:

- I ·11\R� 2 2018
-

1 '; L,,·. ,,1,CT COURT

,•i(.,Ht.•iOtm VA

Petitioner,

Civil No. 3:16CV804

v.

ERIC C. WILSON,
Respondent.

FINAL ORDER

In accordance with the accompanyin g Memorandum Opinion,

it

is ordered that:
1.
Scott's Objections (ECF No. 26) are overruled;
2.
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) is accepted
and adopted;
3.
The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
9)
is
granted;
4.
The § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 7) is denied;
Scott's claims and the action are dismissed; and,
5.
The Court denies a certificate of appealability.
6.
Should Scott desire to appeal,

a written notice of appeal

must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) days
of the date of entry hereof.
within that

period

may

Failure to file a notice of appeal

result in the

loss

of the

right

to

appeal.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum
Opinion and Final Order to Scott and counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.

Date:
Richmond, Virginia

I�

l I� IR1

�

/s/
I
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge