Scott v. Wilson

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/09/2016. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division lL NOV I 0 20l6 ANDREW NEAL SCOTT, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND VA Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:16CV804 ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, Andrew Neal Scott, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. the United States District Court for the In Eastern District of Virginia, all pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpora must be filed on a set of standardized forms. R. 83.4(A). 13, 2016, filing a See E.D. Va. Loe. Civ. Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on October the Court mailed petition pursuant directed Scott Scott to 28 the standardized U.S.C. to complete and return § the 2241. form form The for Court to the Court within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. The Court warned Scott that the failure to complete and return the form in a timely manner would result in dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b). More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the October 13, complete and 2016 Memorandum Order and Scott has failed to return to the Court the standardized form for filing a will be 28 u.s.c. 2241 petition. § dismissed without Accordingly, prejudice. A the action certificate of appealability will be denied. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Scott. It is so ORDERED. /s/ /l&f1 Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Date: )/~ 9/ur~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?