Scott v. Wilson
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/09/2016. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
lL
NOV I 0 20l6
ANDREW NEAL SCOTT,
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND VA
Petitioner,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16CV804
ERIC D. WILSON,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner, Andrew Neal Scott, a federal inmate proceeding
pro se, submitted this petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
the United States District Court for
the
In
Eastern District of
Virginia, all pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpora must
be filed on a set of standardized forms.
R. 83.4(A).
13,
2016,
filing a
See E.D. Va. Loe. Civ.
Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on October
the
Court
mailed
petition pursuant
directed Scott
Scott
to
28
the
standardized
U.S.C.
to complete and return
§
the
2241.
form
form
The
for
Court
to
the Court
within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof.
The Court
warned Scott that the failure to complete and return the form in
a timely manner would result in dismissal of the action.
See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b).
More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of
the October 13,
complete
and
2016 Memorandum Order and Scott has failed to
return
to
the
Court
the
standardized
form
for
filing a
will
be
28
u.s.c.
2241 petition.
§
dismissed
without
Accordingly,
prejudice.
A
the action
certificate
of
appealability will be denied.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send a
copy of
the Memorandum
Opinion to Scott.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
/l&f1
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date:
)/~
9/ur~
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?