Holland v. Hampton Road Regional Jail
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/29/2016. (ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
LONNIE LORENZO HOLLAND,
D
l
DEC 2 9 20!6
CLERK, U.S. DiSTrllCT COURl
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16CV805
HAMPTON ROAD REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Order entered on November 14, 2016, the Court conditionally docketed
Plaintiffs civil action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a statement under oath
or penalty of perjury that:
(A)
(B)
(C)
{D)
~
Identifies the nature of the action;
States his belief that he is entitled to relief;
Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give security therefor; and,
Includes a statement of the assets he possesses.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(l). The Court provided Plaintiff with an informa pauperis affidavit
form for this purpose.
Additionally, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee
by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that
a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry
thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.
Plaintiff has not complied with the orders of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return a
completed informapauperis affidavit form and a consent to collection of fees form. As a result,
he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing
fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure
to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
La~'s1tfl-.
M. Hannah
United States District Judge
DEC 29 2016
Date:
Richmond, Virginia
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?