Peacock v. Clarke

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION. READ OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/25/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

L

Richmond Division

2 5 2017

WILLIAM G. PEACOCK,

PLERK U.S. DiSTfliCT COURT

^RICHMOND. VA

Petitioner,

Civil Action No. 3:16CV847

V.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered onNovember 17,2016, the Court conditionally docketed
Petitioner's action. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that he must keep the Court

informed as to his current address. On April 26,2017, the United States Postal Service returned

to the Court a consent to thejurisdiction of magistrate form marked, "RETURN TO SENDER,"
because Petitioner apparently relocated. Since that date, Petitioner has not contacted the Court to

provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address
indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly,
the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
M. Hannah Lauck

Date: HAK 2 5 2017
Richmond, Virginia

United States District'