Peacock v. Clarke
MEMORANDUM OPINION. READ OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/25/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
2 5 2017
WILLIAM G. PEACOCK,
PLERK U.S. DiSTfliCT COURT
Civil Action No. 3:16CV847
By Memorandum Order entered onNovember 17,2016, the Court conditionally docketed
Petitioner's action. At that time, the Court warned Petitioner that he must keep the Court
informed as to his current address. On April 26,2017, the United States Postal Service returned
to the Court a consent to thejurisdiction of magistrate form marked, "RETURN TO SENDER,"
because Petitioner apparently relocated. Since that date, Petitioner has not contacted the Court to
provide a current address. Petitioner's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address
indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly,
the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
M. Hannah Lauck
Date: HAK 2 5 2017
United States District'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?