Juste v. Embassy of Haiti et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
JUM 2 2 2017
CLERK. U.S. DiSiRiCT COURT
Civil Action No. 3:16CV904
EMBASSY OF HAITI, et al.,
Plaintiff, a federal detainee proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this civil rights
action. Courts must liberally construe pro se civil rights complaints in order to address
constitutional deprivations. Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978).
Nevertheless, "[pjrinciples requiring generous construction ofpro se complaints are
not... without limits." Beaudett v. City ofHampton, 775 F.2d 1274,1278 (4th Cir. 1985).
Plaintiffs current allegations fail to provide each defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal
basis upon which his or her liability rests. See Bell All. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555
(2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41,47 (1957)). Accordingly, by Memorandum
Order entered on June 1,2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint
within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof The Court warned Plaintiffthat the failure
to submit the particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action.
More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the entry of the June 1, 2017
Memorandum Order. Plaintiff failed to submit aparticularized complaint or otherwise respond
to the June 1, 2017 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
M. Hannah Lau([
JUM 2 2 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?