Johnson v. Berryhill
Filing
46
FINAL ORDER that: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 44 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court; (2) Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED; and, (3) Plaintif f's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. (please see Final Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 09/26/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
VINITA JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL NO. 3:16cv923-HEH
V.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
etal.,
Defendants.
FINAL ORDER
(Adopting Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge)
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (R&R) entered on September 5, 2017 (ECF No. 44). The time to file objections has
expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it
otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 44) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court.
(2)
Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is
GRANTED.
(3)
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
as to Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.
Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record and pro
se Plaintiff at her address of record.
It is so ORDERED.
Richmond, Virginia
Date:
2^ 2011
/s/
Henry E. Hudson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?