Frazier v. Wilson

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 06/18/2018. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )

i

I

IH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JUN I 9 2018

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

a

Richmond Division

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND. VA

KEVIN E. FRAZIER,
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 3:16CV933

V.

ERIC WILSON,

Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kevin E. Frazier, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this petition for habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (hereinafter "§ 2241 Petition," ECF No. 1.) Frazier contends that the
Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") has improperly calculated his federal sentence. By Memorandum
Opinion and Order entered on February 1, 2018, the Court denied without prejudice

Respondent's motion for summary judgment and granted Frazier's motion to supplement. (ECF
Nos. 20-21.) Frazier has submitted another Motion to Supplement, wherein he seeks to add
additional argument in support of his § 2241 Petition. (ECF No. 26.) Frazier's Motion to
Supplement(ECF No.26) will be GRANTED.
The matter is now before the Court on Respondent's Renewed Motion for Summary

Judgment("Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment," ECF No. 28). Frazier has also submitted

a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24), and has responded to Respondent's Renewed
Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 30.) The matter is ripe for disposition.
In his § 2241 Petition and Memorandum in Support of his Motion to Supplement (ECF

No. 19), Frazier argues he is entitled to relief based upon the following claims:'

' The Court employs the pagination assigned by the CM/ECF docketing system to
Frazier's submissions.

Further, the Court corrects the spelling and capitalization in the

quotations from Frazier's submissions.