Hall v. May et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 05/26/2017. (mailed copy to pro se Plaintiff) (nbrow)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
MAY 2 6 20l7
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Civil Action No.
T. MAY, et al. ,
a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C.
state a viable claim under 42 U.S. C.
In order to
a plaintiff must
allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived
him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by
a law of the United States.
See Dowe v.
Poverty in Roanoke Valley,
(citing 42 U.S.C.
In his current Complaint, Hall does
violated by the defendants'
F. 3d 653,
Total Action Against
Plaintiff also failed to
Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on April 26,
Court directed Hall to submit a particularized complaint within
the date of entry thereof.
complaint would result in the dismissal of the action.
More than fourteen
of the April 26,
days have elapsed since the entry
2017 Memorandum Order.
Hall failed to submit
a particularized complaint or otherwise responded to the April
dismissed without prejudice.
directed to send a
Opinion to Hall.
It is so ORDERED.
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?