Coleman v. McNelis et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 6/25/2018. Copy to Pro Se Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

RAYMOND COLEMAN,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3:16CV961-HEH

V.

K McNELIS,et al.
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice Against Four Defendants)

Raymond Coleman, a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se and informa pauperis,

brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4(m), Coleman had ninety (90)days from the filing ofthe Complaint to serve the
Defendants. Here, that period commenced on August 4, 2017. By Memorandum Order
entered on November 28, 2017, the Court directed Coleman, within eleven(11) days of

the date of entry thereof, to show good cause for his failure to serve the four Unknown

and Unnamed Employees listed in the Complaint within the time required by Rule 4(m).
Coleman has not responded to the Court's November 28, 2017 Memorandum Order.

Accordingly, all claims against the four Unknown and Unnamed Employees listed in the
Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
/sz

Date:
^
Richmond, Virginia

Henry E. Hudson
Senior United States District Judge