Hardy v. Clarke

Filing 25

FINAL ORDER in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Hardy's objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation 22 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3. The Motion to Dismiss 16 is GRANTED; 4. Har dy's Motion to Amend 20 is DENIED; 5. Hardy's § 2254 Petition 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, 6. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Hardy desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 06/21/2017. Copy of Final Order and Memorandum Opinion mailed to Petitioner. (ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division re 1 -' 1 U VERNAL TIMOTHY HARDY, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. JU~ 2 I 20!7 ) ) ) ) ) ) CLERK, U.S. D1STR1CT COURl RICHMOND, VA Civil Action No. 3:16CV963-HEH FINAL ORDER (Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Action) In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Hardy's objections are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED; Hardy's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 20) is DENIED; Hardy's § 2254 Petition (ECF No. I) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Hardy desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Hardy and counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. Date: JU I\'- 2.1 t.oJ? Richmond, Virgfnia .· ) ) Petitioner, ~ ~ .---:.~!...--=[L::...---~--.., ~ /s/ HENRY E. HUDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?