Souvanaratana v. Clarke

Filing 19

FINAL ORDER that in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 2. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7 ) is GRANTED; 3. Souvanaratana's &# 167; 2254 Petition (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED; 4. Souvanaratana's claims and the action are DISMISSED; and, 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. And it is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 08/10/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DO SOUVANARATANA, Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:16CV993 HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent. FINAL ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 2. 3. 4. 5. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED; Souvanaratana's ยง 2254 Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; Souvanaratana's claims and the action are DISMISSED; and, A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Souvanaratana desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Souvanaratana and counsel of record. And it is so ORDERED. Date: 0llo/n I f Richmond, Virginia JohnA.Gibney, Jr. United States Distri^ Judj

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?