Trish v. Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER. it is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge 22 is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 is denied; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 14 is denied; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 20 is granted; The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and The Clerk shall close this action. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/12/2018. (tjoh, )

Download PDF
rM 1 i• • F£B I 2 2018 D IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ANGELA TRISH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. NANCY A. 3:17cvl5 BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER This matter RECOMMENDATION of 2018 is No. (Docket RECOMMENDATION, thereto, having and 22) 22) . and considered the no error the Magistrate Court Judge Having there and the time for finding REPORT the before being no the entered reviewed timely on the REPORT AND January 26, REPORT AND filed objections filing objections having expired, record and the therein, AND RECOMMENDATION on of it the is REPORT hereby Magistrate and AND RECOMMENDATION ORDERED Judge that the (Docket No. is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It (1) 13) is further ORDERED t h a t : PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket is denied; (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (Docket No. 14) is No. denied; (3) 20) DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. is granted; (5) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; (6) The Clerk shall close this action. The Clerk is P l a i n t i f f and a l l It is directed to send a copy of this and Order counsel of record. so ORDERED. /s/ Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Date: February 2018 to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?