Trish v. Colvin
Filing
23
ORDER. it is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge 22 is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 is denied; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 14 is denied; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 20 is granted; The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; and The Clerk shall close this action. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/12/2018. (tjoh, )
rM
1 i•
•
F£B I 2 2018
D
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND. VA
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
ANGELA TRISH,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
v.
NANCY A.
3:17cvl5
BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
This
matter
RECOMMENDATION
of
2018
is
No.
(Docket
RECOMMENDATION,
thereto,
having
and
22)
22) .
and
considered the
no
error
the
Magistrate
Court
Judge
Having
there
and the time for
finding
REPORT
the
before
being
no
the
entered
reviewed
timely
on
the
REPORT
AND
January
26,
REPORT
AND
filed
objections
filing objections having expired,
record and the
therein,
AND RECOMMENDATION
on
of
it
the
is
REPORT
hereby
Magistrate
and
AND RECOMMENDATION
ORDERED
Judge
that
the
(Docket
No.
is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION.
It
(1)
13)
is
further
ORDERED t h a t :
PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION
FOR
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Docket
is denied;
(2)
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND
(Docket No.
14)
is
No.
denied;
(3)
20)
DEFENDANT'S
MOTION
FOR
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Docket
No.
is granted;
(5)
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed;
(6)
The Clerk shall close this action.
The
Clerk
is
P l a i n t i f f and a l l
It
is
directed
to
send
a
copy
of
this
and
Order
counsel of record.
so ORDERED.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date:
February
2018
to
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?