Prasad v. Rolfe et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/06/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
SEP - 7 20f1
SUNDARI K. PRASAD,
CLERK, U.S. DISTA1CT COURl
Civil Action No. 3:17CV64
MELINDA ROLFE, et al.,
By Memorandum Order entered on July 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a
particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. Because Plaintiff
failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 20, 2017
Memorandum Order, by Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on August 23, 2017, the
Court dismissed the action. However, later that same day, the Court received Plaintiffs tardy
Particularized Complaint. Because the Particularized Complaint was received the same day as
the Court dismissed the action, the August 23, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order will be
VACATED. The Court will continue to process the action.
An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
l~E P fl
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?