Prasad v. Rolfe et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/06/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division SEP - 7 20f1 SUNDARI K. PRASAD, CLERK, U.S. DISTA1CT COURl RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17CV64 MELINDA ROLFE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on July 20, 2017, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a particularized complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof. Because Plaintiff failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the July 20, 2017 Memorandum Order, by Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on August 23, 2017, the Court dismissed the action. However, later that same day, the Court received Plaintiffs tardy Particularized Complaint. Because the Particularized Complaint was received the same day as the Court dismissed the action, the August 23, 2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order will be VACATED. The Court will continue to process the action. An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. La:C~ Date: l~E P fl Richmond, Virginia 0 2011.J M. Hannah United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?