Prasad v. Rolfe et al

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 07/03/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )

I I

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

E

JUL - 3 2018

Richmond Division

SUNDARI K.PRASAD,
Plaintiff,
V.

Civil Action No. 3:17CV64

MELINDA ROLFE,et ai.
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Sundari K. Prasad, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted this action, and at least

fifty other civil actions over the prior two years. Prasad's actions have been dismissed either as
frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim, or because she has failed to follow the

directives ofthe Court. Prasad's many actions have strained the resources ofthe Court.
Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered June 4,2018,the Court directed Prasad,

within fourteen days of the date of entry thereof, to submit a certificate of compliance that
required specific information from Prasad, before the Court would review her claims. The Court

warned Prasad that a failure to comply with the Court's directives would result in dismissal of
the action.

More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the entry of the June 4, 2018
Memorandum Order. Prasad failed to submit the requisite certificate of compliance or
otherwise respond to the June 4,2018 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, the action will be
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/
M. Hannah Lauck

f?X
1/

United States District Judge
Date: July 03/ 2018

Richmond, Virginia