McKinney v. Walrath et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 04/10/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
APR I I 20!7
Richmond Division
DAVID MATTHEW McKINNEY,
CLERK. U.S. D1Slrl1CT COURl
RICHMOND. VA
Petitioner,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17CV103
JOHN WALRATH, et al.,
Respondents.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Petitioner,
David
Matthew
McKinney,
a
Virginia
inmate
proceeding pro se, petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28
u .S. C.
§
counts
of
2254
wherein
robbery,
he
eight
challenges
his
counts
attempted
of
sentences
for
eight
robbery,
seven
counts of use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, grand
larceny,
and conspiracy in the Circuit Court for
Virginia Beach.
On March 11,
2008,
the City of
the Court denied a
§
2254
petition filed by McKinney challenging the above convictions.
McKinney v. Ray, No. 3:07CV266, 2008 WL 652111, at *l, *3
(E.D.
Va. Mar. 11, 2008).
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
restricted
the
second
successive
or
jurisdiction
of
the
applications
district
for
federal
courts
habeas
to
hear
corpus
relief by prisoners attacking the validity of their convictions
and
sentences
Felker
v.
by
Turpin,
establishing
518
U.S.
651,
a
"'gatekeeping'
657
(1996).
mechanism."
Specifically,
"[b) efore a second or successive application permitted by this
section is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move
in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the
district
§
court
to
2244 (b} (3) (A} .
consider
the
application."
Court of Appeals
file the present
2254 Petition.
for
u.s.c.
The Court has not received authorization from
the United States
dismissed
28
§
want
of
for
the
Fourth Circuit
to
Therefore, the action will be
jurisdiction.
The
Court
will
deny
a
certificate of appealability.
An
appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum
Opinion.
/s/
fl4!1A~I J Oj1f;11
Richmon~J;i~inia
Date:
/l.E/1
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?