Shaia v. Malone
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/21/2017. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HARRY SHAIA, JR.,
Civil Action No. 3:17cvll4
RUSSELL H. MALONE, III,
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Withdrawal of the Reference filed
by Debtor Russell H. Malone, III ("Malone" or "Debtor"), Malone Family Holdings, LLC
("MFH"), 10200 W.B. Associates, LLC, Stony Point, LLC, MH Futures, LLC, Debtor's wife,
Anne Elizabeth "Beth" Malone ("Ms. Malone"), and Debtor's son, Russell H. Malone, IV
("Russell") (collectively, the "Defendants"). (ECF No. 1.) Defendants seek permissive
withdrawal of the adversary proceeding initiated when Trustee Harry Shaia, Jr., ("Trustee") filed
a two-count complaint against Defendants in the underlying bankruptcy action. Trustee opposes
the withdrawal. The Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d).^
The parties fully briefed the matter in the Bankruptcy Court, and the Court dispenses with
oral argument because the materials before it adequately present the facts and legal contentions,
and argument would not aid the decisional process. The matter is ripe for disposition. For the
reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion for Withdrawal of the Reference and remand
the case to the Bankruptcy Court.
^Section 157(d) provides, in relevant part, that "[t]he district court may withdraw, in
whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under this section, on its own motion or on
timely motion of any party, for cause shown." 28 U.S.C. § 157(d).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?