Interactive Brokers LLC v. Saroop et al
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 08/31/2017. (walk, )
B
p
L
E
l-N
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SEP - 1 2017
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
l/
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND. VA
INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
Plaintiff,
V.
Civil Action No.
ROHIT SAROOP,
3:17cvl27
PREYA SAROOP,
and GEORGE SOFIS,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the PETITION
filed
by
Plaintiff
the
DEFENDANTS'
No.
18)
filed
Saroop.
For
DENIED,
and
panel
for
Interactive
CROSS-MOTION
by
the
this
TO
Defendants
reasons
set
matter
Brokers,
clarification.
To
CONFIRM
George
forth
will
LLC
be
the
("Interactive")
ARBITRATION
Sofis
below,
and
both
remanded
(ECF No.
and
AWARD
Rohit
and
motions
1)
(ECF
Preya
will
be
the
arbitration
that
extent
to
the
Defendants'
Cross-Motion and subsequent memoranda can also be construed as a
motion for sanctions,
that motion will be DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Although
the
Court
rendered
Financial
panel
on
as
styled
a
as
motion
against
to
"petition," this matter comes
vacate
Interactive
Industry
January
a
5,
Brokers,
Regulatory
2017.
the
arbitration
LLC
Authority
(ECF No.
1,
Ex.
award
before
that
("Interactive")
(FINRA)
1) .
was
by
a
arbitration
The Award
(ECF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?