Schuett v. Wilson et al
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION. READ OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
CLIFFORD J. SCHUETT,
CLERK. U.S. OrSTh1CT COURl
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17CV174
MR. WILSON, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Clifford J. Schuett, a federal inmate,
submitted this civil
action and applied to proceed in forma pauperis.
Order entered on April
also
filed
another
(E.D.
Va.),
three
strikes
28,
2017,
action,
wherein the
under
28
the Court noted that Schuett
Schuett
Court
v.
Wilson,
indicated
U.S.C.
By Memorandum
that
1915{g).
§
No. 3:17CV102
Schuett may have
The
Court directed
Schuett to comply with certain directives pertaining to whether
he has three strikes under 28 U.S.C.
his
medical
care
explained that
for
to date,
his
1915(g) and pertaining to
§
chronic
The
conditions.
Schuett had failed
Court
to comply with the
Failing to receive the result
Court's directives in 3:17CV102.
he desired in 3:17CV102, it appeared that Schuett was attempting
to
litigate
this
new
action
directives of the Court.
it
would
take
no
complied with the
action
instead
Thus,
in
of
complying
with
the
the Court informed Schuett that
the
directives of
instant
the
Court
case
until
Schuett
in 3: l 7CV102.
The
Court also warned that a
failure to comply with the Order
(ECF
No. 5) in 3:17CV102 would result in dismissal of that action and
this one.
Schuett failed to comply with the directives of the Court
in 3 : 1 7CV02 .
earlier
Ac cording 1 y,
Memorandum
Order,
as the Court warned Schuett in its
the
Court
will
also
dismiss
this
action without prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion to Schuett.
It is so ORDERED.
Date:
~vU/ J..1
Richmo~:
1
)--I
Virginia
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
I'/
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?