Schuett v. Wilson et al

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM OPINION. READ OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 06/22/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division CLIFFORD J. SCHUETT, CLERK. U.S. OrSTh1CT COURl RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17CV174 MR. WILSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Clifford J. Schuett, a federal inmate, submitted this civil action and applied to proceed in forma pauperis. Order entered on April also filed another (E.D. Va.), three strikes 28, 2017, action, wherein the under 28 the Court noted that Schuett Schuett Court v. Wilson, indicated U.S.C. By Memorandum that 1915{g). § No. 3:17CV102 Schuett may have The Court directed Schuett to comply with certain directives pertaining to whether he has three strikes under 28 U.S.C. his medical care explained that for to date, his 1915(g) and pertaining to § chronic The conditions. Schuett had failed Court to comply with the Failing to receive the result Court's directives in 3:17CV102. he desired in 3:17CV102, it appeared that Schuett was attempting to litigate this new action directives of the Court. it would take no complied with the action instead Thus, in of complying with the the Court informed Schuett that the directives of instant the Court case until Schuett in 3: l 7CV102. The Court also warned that a failure to comply with the Order (ECF No. 5) in 3:17CV102 would result in dismissal of that action and this one. Schuett failed to comply with the directives of the Court in 3 : 1 7CV02 . earlier Ac cording 1 y, Memorandum Order, as the Court warned Schuett in its the Court will also dismiss this action without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Schuett. It is so ORDERED. Date: ~vU/ J..1 Richmo~: 1 )--I Virginia Robert E. Payne Senior United States District Judge I'/ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?