Hicks, Jr. v. Khawaja
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 10/07/2017. Copy mailed to Hicks.(tjoh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
OZELIA HICKS,
CLERK. U S DISTRICT COURT
PICHMC-'":
JR.,
Plaintiff,
V.
Civil Action No.
LAURA S.
3:17CV406
KHAWAJA,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Order
entered on June
conditionally docketed this
directed Ozelia Hicks,
Jr.
action.
At
to submit a
7,
that
2017,
the
Court
time,
the
Court
statement under oath or
penalty of perjury that:
(A)
(B)
Identifies the nature of the action;
States his belief that he is entitled to relief;
(C)
Avers
(D)
security therefor; and,
Includes a statement of the assets he possesses.
See 28 U.S.C.
that he
is unable
§ 1915(a)(1).
to prepay fees
or give
The Court provided Hicks with an in
forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose.
Additionally,
the
Court
directed
Hicks
to
affirm
his
intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a
consent to the collection of fees
that
a
within
failure
thirty
to
(30)
form.
The Court warned Hicks
comply with either of
days
of
the
date
of
result in summary dismissal of the action.
the
above
entry
directives
thereof
would
i
Hicks
statutory
failed
filing
§ 1914(a).
on
July
to
return either
fee
for
the
form
instant
and
failed
action.
to
See
28
pay
the
U.S.C.
Accordingly, by Memorandum Opinion and Order entered
21,
2017
the
Court
dismissed
the
action
without
prejudice.
Later during the day on July 21,
2017,
the Clerk received a
Hicks's completed ^
forma pauperis affidavit and his consent to
the
fees
collection
docketed until
of
July 24,
form;
2017.
however,
Because
the
the
forms
Court
were
not
received the
completed forms on the same day as the action was dismissed, by
Memorandum Order
the July 21,
entered on August
8,
2017,
the
Court
vacated
2017 Memorandum Opinion and Order and continued to
process the action.
By Memorandum Order entered on August 31,
2017,
the Court
directed Hicks to pay an initial partial filing fee of $47.46 or
state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient
assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11)
entry thereof.
See 28 U.S.C.
letter from Hicks,
2017,
§ 1915(b)(1).
days of the date of
In response to a
by Memorandum Order entered on September 22,
the Court provided Hicks with another eleven
pay the initial filing fee.
partial filing
Therefore,
is
not
days to
Hicks has neither paid the initial
fee nor averred that he
Hicks
(11)
cannot pay such a
entitled to proceed
fee.
forma pauperis.
Hick's disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of
the action.
Accordingly,
the action will be dismissed without
prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send
a
copy
of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Hicks.
/s/
Robert E.
Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date:
Richmond, Virginia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?