Brown v. Cofield et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/12/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
SEP I 2 20t7
DASHAUN TAREEK BROWN,
Plaintiff,
CLERK. U.S. DtSTrhCT COURl
RICHMOND. VA
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17CV485
L. COFIELD, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Order entered on August 1,
conditionally docketed this
action.
At
that
2017,
the Court
time,
the Court
directed Dashaun Tareek Brown to submit a statement under oath
or penalty of perjury that:
(A}
(B)
( C}
(D}
Identifies the nature of the action;
States his belief that he is entitled to relief;
Avers that he is unable to prepay fees or give
security therefor; and,
Includes a statement of the assets he possesses.
See 28 U.S.C.
§
1915(a} (1).
The Court provided Brown with an in
forma pauperis affidavit form for this purpose.
Additionally,
the
Court
directed
Brown
to
affirm
his
intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a
consent to the collection of fees form.
that a
failure
within
thirty
The Court warned Brown
to comply with either of
( 3 O}
days
of
the
date
of
result in summary dismissal of the action.
the above directives
entry
thereof
would
Brown has not complied with the order of this Court.
Brown
failed to return the in forma pauperis affidavit and the consent
to collection of fees form.
As a
for in forma pauperis status.
result,
he does not qualify
Furthermore, he has not paid the
See 28
statutory filing fee for the instant action.
1914 (a) .
Such
conduct
demonstrates
prosecute.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
a
willful
u.s.c.
failure
§
to
Accordingly, this action
will be dismissed without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send a
copy of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Brown.
/s/
f2l f
'
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date:~~
Richmond, Virginia
ll1
"Wi7
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?