Sirleaf v. United States of America et al

Filing 46

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/8/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

|
NOV - 8 20iB

PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF,JR.,
clerk. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
'RICHMOND. VA

Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3:17CV539-HEH

V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et al.
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Denying Second Motion to Reconsider)

Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, filed this 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action. The matter if before the Court on Plaintiffs "OMNIBUS
MOTION TO : RECONSIDER ; TRANSFER JUDGESHIP ;& NOTICE OF APPEAL

- in the alternative" ("Second Motion to Reconsider," ECF No.41,42)
I. Procedural History

Plaintiffs allegations failed to provide each defendant with fair notice ofthe facts

and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. Accordingly, by Memorandum
Order entered on May 9, 2018, the Court directed Plaintiffto submit a Second
Particularized Complaint within fourteen (14) days ofthe date of entry thereof. The
Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to submit the Second Particularized Complaint
would result in the dismissal ofthe action. More than fourteen(14)days elapsed after the

entry of the May 9, 2018 Memorandum Order and Plaintiff failed to submit a Second
Particularized Complaint or otherwise respond to the May 9, 2018 Memorandum Order.